GB 10136—2015《食品安全国家标准动物性水产制品》跟踪评价反馈意见分析和探讨
作者:
作者单位:

(舟山市卫生监督所,浙江 舟山 316022)

作者简介:

夏追平 男 副主任医师 研究方向为营养与食品卫生 E-mail:347582175@qq.com

通讯作者:

吴媛 女 三级主任科员 研究方向为食品安全标准 E-mail:killtime3531@163.com

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis and discussion on feedback of follow-up evaluation of National Food Safety Standard for Animal Derived Aquatic Products (GB 10136-2015)
Author:
Affiliation:

(Zhoushan Agency for Public Health Inspection, Zhejiang Zhoushan 316022, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对GB 10136—2015《食品安全国家标准 动物性水产制品》进行标准跟踪评价,为标准的修订提供参考。方法 整理和分析2018年1月至2020年10月企业人员、监管人员、检验(检测)人员和行业协会/科研院校反馈的专项调查问卷中对标准的反馈意见和实施效果,不同调查对象实施效果量化评分资料采用统计学描述和检验进行分析;反馈意见和建议分别从填写人员职业、意见反馈内容两个维度进行细分编码,采用构成指标进行统计描述分析,评价结果的比较采用统计学检验分析。结果 共发放问卷220份,回收182份(82.73%,182/220),有效问卷171份(77.73%,171/220)。不同调查对象的问卷回收率和有效应答率差异均有统计学意义(χ2=28.359,P<0.05;χ2=24.112,P<0.05);从反馈意见内容分析:共收集到意见和建议208条,涉及科学性的占77.88%(162/208),可行性和协调性上分别占11.54%(24/208)和10.58%(22/208);其中企业人员反馈109条(52.40%)、检验(检测)人员反馈49条(23.56%)、监管人员反馈37条(17.79%)、行业协会/科研院校反馈13条(6.25%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=64.119,P<0.05)。从实施效果评价分析:不同调查对象对健康需求(H=32.302)、产业发展(H=28.394)、监管需求(H=29.070)、文本结构(H=18.903)和应用范围(H=8.382)的合理性的评分结果差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);企业人员、监管人员和行业协会/科研院校的评分在3.50~5.00分,检验(检测)人员的评分在3.00~4.50分。结论 调查对象着重关注点在标准的“术语与定义” “指标设置”等科学性,可基于评价内容和指标的基础上结合现场调研和专家咨询的内容,作为对该标准跟踪评价的补充和佐证。

    Abstract:

    Objective The National Food Safety Standard for Animal Derived Aquatic Products (GB 10136-2015) was evaluated to provide reference for the revision of the standard. Methods Feedback and implementation effect from enterprises, inspection agencies, industry associations and scientific research institutions were collected and analyzed through questionnaire from January 2018 to October 2020. The quantitative score data of implementation effect of different survey objects were analyzed by statistical description and test; feedback and suggestions were subdivided and coded from the two dimensions of filling in personnel occupation and feedback content, and the constituent indicators was analyzed by statistical description, and the comparison of evaluation results was analyzed by statistical test. Results A total of 220 special follow-up evaluation questionnaires were sent out and 182 questionnaires were recovered, of which 171 were valid. The overall recovery rate was 82.73% (182/220) and the effective response rate was 77.73% (171/220). The results showed that there were significant differences in the recovery rate and the effective response rate among different respondents (χ2=28.359,P<0.05;χ2=24.112,P<0.05). Content analysis of feedback:208 opinions and suggestions were collected, of which 77.88%(162/208) were about scientific issue, 11.54%(24/208) were about feasibility and 10.58%(22/208) were about coordination. The feedback from enterprises accounted for 52.40% of all the respondents, followed by 49 (23.56%) from inspection agencies, 37 (17.79%) from supervisors, and 13 (6.25%) from industry associations/scientific research institutions, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=64.119, P<0.05). Analysis of implementation effect:from the result of health demand(H=32.302), industrial development(H=28.394), regulatory demand(H=29.070), text structure(H=18.903) and application scope(H=8.382), the differences of scores of different respondents were statistically significant (P<0.05). The score of enterprises, supervisors and industry associations/scientific research institutions was 3.50-5.00, and the score of inspection agencies was 3.00-4.50. Conclusion The subjects of the survey focused on the scientific aspects of the terms, definitions and indicators setting. The results can be used as a supplement and evidence for the follow-up evaluation of the standard based on the evaluation content and indicators combined with the content of field investigation and expert consultation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏追平,吴媛,顾仲朝,石善波,梅宏舟. GB 10136—2015《食品安全国家标准动物性水产制品》跟踪评价反馈意见分析和探讨[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2021,33(1):104-109.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-04-06
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭