2017年食品安全国家标准跟踪评价意见反馈情况分析
作者:
作者单位:

(国家食品安全风险评估中心,北京 100022)

作者简介:

田静 女 副研究员 研究方向为食品安全国家标准管理 E-mail:tianjing960928@126.com通信作者:┣┣(中)通信作者┫┫樊永祥 男 研究员 研究方向为食品安全国家标准管理 E-mail:fanyongxiang@cfsa.net.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The analysis of the feedback from national food safety standard follow-up evaluation in 2017
Author:
Affiliation:

(China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment,Beijing 100022,China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析2017年食品安全国家标准跟踪评价意见反馈情况。针对关注度较高的标准,判断所收集意见的参考价值,为完善我国食品安全国家标准跟踪评价机制提出建议。方法 整理分析2017年1~12月期间通过食品安全国家标准跟踪评价及意见反馈平台收集的评价意见,统计分析收集意见的基本情况,并筛选出意见内容中出现的高频词汇。针对公众关注度较高的10项标准,筛选出具有参考价值的意见并计算其所占比例。结果 意见反馈平台收到有效反馈意见共5 057条,意见涉及298项标准,重点关注各项标准中涉及“方法与检测”“指标与限量”“标示与标签”“范围与定义”“(食品)类别与分类”的相关内容。对于10项关注度较高的标准,具有参考价值的意见占全部有效意见的43.5%(1 279/2 937)。结论 意见反馈平台所收集的意见对于完善标准具有一定的参考价值,部分意见可作为标准修订的参考依据。提议深化标准跟踪评价的概念,并组建标准跟踪评价专家小组、完善平台设置以更高效地开展标准跟踪评价研究工作,保障我国食品安全国家标准质量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze the feedback from National Food Safety Standard follow-up evaluation in 2017; to figure out the valuable suggestions regarding the standards with high concern. To provide advice to improve the mechanism of National Food Safety Standard follow-up evaluation. Methods According to the suggestions collected from January to December in 2017, through national food safety standard follow-up evaluation and feedback platform, descriptive analysis was conducted and the high frequency words were selected from the suggestions. The suggestions regarding the top 10 key standards were classified into valuable or non-valuable group and the rates of valuable suggestions were calculated. Results In 2017, totally 5 057 suggestions covering 298 standards were collected. The suggestions reflected that the food classification,detection method, items and limit levels, food label, scope and definition were highly concerned. Among the suggestions regarding the top 10 key standards, 43.5%(1 279/2 937) of the suggestions were valuable. Conclusion Some suggestions collected through the platform were valuable and worthy to be taken into consideration during the revision of the standards. In order to improve the efficiency of the standard follow-up evaluation and ensure the quality of National Food Safety Standards, it is necessary to expand the concept of ‘national food safety standard follow-up evaluation’, and establish related expert group.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田静,吴迪,樊永祥.2017年食品安全国家标准跟踪评价意见反馈情况分析[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2018,30(6):650-654.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-01-23
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭