基于SPME-GC-MS技术结合电子鼻电子舌分析不同热处理牛乳风味的差异
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国检验检疫科学研究院,北京 100176;2.丽水学院,浙江 丽水 323020;3.沈阳农业大学,辽宁 沈阳 110161

作者简介:

许凌云 女 硕士研究生 研究方向为食品热处理、HACCP体系 E-mail:15227831802@163.com

通讯作者:

王铁龙 男 高级工程师 研究方向为食品热处理、HACCP体系 E-mail:36924431@qq.com

中图分类号:

R155

基金项目:

河北省重点研发计划项目(20327113D);河北省重点研发计划项目(21327117D)


Analysis of flavor difference of milk with electronic nose and electronic tongue based on SPME-GC-MS
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing 100176, China;2.Lishui University, Zhejiang Lishui 323020, China;3.Shenyang Agricultural University, Liaoning Shenyang 110161, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究不同热处理牛乳即巴氏杀菌乳、超高温瞬时(UHT)灭菌乳和蒸汽浸入式(INF)杀菌乳的香气品质差异。方法 利用固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用法(SPME-GC-MS)对三种热处理牛乳的挥发性风味组分进行鉴定,并结合电子鼻和电子舌对不同热处理牛乳的风味进行更直观的区分。结果 GC-MS技术共检测出热处理牛乳中53种挥发性风味化合物,主要是由13种醛类、10种脂肪酸类、9种醇类、7种酮类和3种内酯类组成。其中巴氏杀菌乳以辛酸、癸酸等脂肪酸类和壬醛、癸醛等醛类为主;INF杀菌乳中以辛酸、癸酸、乙酸等脂肪酸类为主,其次是辛醛、壬醛等醛类和糠醇、2-乙基-1-己醇等醇类;UHT灭菌乳则是以2-庚酮、2-壬酮和2-十一酮等酮类为主,其次是辛酸、己酸等脂肪酸类和丙醛、壬醛等醛类,然后是δ-癸内酯和δ-十二内酯等内酯类。电子鼻对不同热处理牛乳有明显不同响应,主成分分析(PCA)前两主成分可以很好地区分不同热处理牛乳的挥发性风味物质,传感器W5S、W1S、W1W和W2S对牛乳气味影响最大。电子舌结果表明不同热处理牛乳在鲜味和口感浓厚程度上差异显著,且PCA分析前两主成分可以完全区分不同热处理牛乳。结论 SPME-GC-MS结合电子鼻电子舌技术可以很好地用于区分不同热处理牛乳的香气品质。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the difference in aroma quality of different heat-treated milk, including pasteurized milk, ultra-high temperature instantaneous sterilized (UHT) milk and infusion technology sterilized (INF) milk.Methods The volatile flavor components of three kinds of heat-treated milk were identified by solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS), and the flavor of different heat-treated milk were also distinguished by electronic nose and electronic tongue.Results A total of 53 volatile compounds were identified, mainly including 13 aldehydes, 10 fatty acids, 9 alcohols, 7 ketones and 3 lactones. The major volatile compounds of pasteurized milk were octanoic acid, decanoic acid, nonanal and decanal; that of INF milk were octanoic acid, decanoic acid, acetic acid, octanal, nonanal, furfurol and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol; that of UHT milk were 2-heptanone, 2-nonanone, 2-undecanone, octanoic acid, hexanoic acid, propanal, nonanal, followed by δ-decalactone and δ-dodecalactone. The responses of the electronic nose to different milk differed significantly. The first two principal components in principal component analysis (PCA) could well distinguish the volatile flavor compounds of different milk. The sensors W5S, W1S, W1W and W2S played major roles in the flavor of milk. The e-tongue results showed that there were significant differences in umami and richness, and the first two principal components of PCA could completely distinguish different milk.Conclusion SPME-GC-MS combined with electronic nose and electronic tongue can be used to distinguish the aroma quality of different heat-treated milk.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

许凌云,刁钢,石小亮,杨倩,王铁龙.基于SPME-GC-MS技术结合电子鼻电子舌分析不同热处理牛乳风味的差异[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2023,35(1):55-64.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-23
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-07
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭