两种选择性培养基HE、CAS检测沙门菌效果的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

闫琳 女 硕士生 研究方向为食品微生物学 Email:yanlin1224@sina.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R155.5

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(30571575);科技部科研院所技术开发研究专项(2009EG150293)


Comparing the effectiveness of two selective media HE and CAS for the detection of salmonella in foods
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较两种沙门菌选择性培养基HE和CAS在食物样本检测中的敏感性、准确性和时效性。方法 观察典型沙门菌和非沙门菌在两种选择培养基上的生长状况和菌落形态。通过人工染菌实验,比较两种选择性培养基分离沙门菌的检测效果。采集16份市售整鸡样本,进一步比较两种培养基沙门菌的阳性检出率。结果 沙门菌在HE平板上为绿色菌落,大多有黑心;在CAS平板上为紫色菌落。含菌量为10 CFU/25g鸡肉样本,经SC增菌8 h,可用CAS检出沙门菌;而采用HE则需增菌18 h才可检出。16份整鸡样本,增菌8、12和18 h,采用CAS的阳性检出率分别为43.75%、31.25%和37.5%,相应时间下采用HE的阳性检出率分别为18.75%、25%和18.75%。8份新鲜整鸡样本,检出4份阳性;8份冷冻整鸡样本,检出3份阳性。结论 CAS选择性平板可抑制大多杂菌生长,沙门菌在其上菌落形态较易鉴别。CAS分离沙门菌的检出时限和检测灵敏度都明显优于HE,建议在食物样本检测沙门菌时应首选CAS。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the effectiveness of two kinds of selective media HE (hektoen enteric agar) and CAS (CHROM agar salmonella medium) on the detection of salmonella in food samples. Method The growth status and the morphology of salmonella and non-salmonella colonies on HE and CAS were observed. Twenty five grams of chicken meat were distributed in 225 ml of SC (Selenite Cystine Broth) and salmonella standard strain CMCC 50041 was used to perform artificially-contaminated experiments. The final concentration of salmonella for each sample was 0, 1, 10, 102, 103, 104, 105 and 106 CFU per 25g poultry respectively. All samples were incubated at 37℃ for 0 h, 4 h,8 h, 12 h and 18 h. One loop from each culture medium taken at different incubation time was streaked on HE or CAS plates. The suspected salmonella colonies were confirmed by API 20E. The sensitivity of two media on the isolation of salmonella was compared. Sixteen retail whole chicken samples collected from markets in Beijing were examined by HE and CAS plates after enriched at 37℃ for 8h, 12 h and 18h in SC, and the positive rates in HE and CAS plates were compared. Results The colony of salmonella spp. on HE is green, most are black in the center, but that on CAS is mauve. Salmonella could be isolated by CAS from poultry samples containing at least 10 CFU per 25g samples after being enriched for 8h in SC; but 18h of enrichment was needed for achieving the same result with HE. The positive rates of salmonella for 16 whole chicken samples were 43.75%,31.25% and 37.5% isolated by CAS after enrichment for 8h, 12 h and 18h respectively; and the positive rate were 18.75%,25% and 18.75% isolated by HE, correspondingly. Salmonella in 4 of 8 fresh whole chicken samples were positive, whereas in 3 of 8 frozen whole chicken samples were positive. Conclusion The growth of most other bacteria except salmonella could be restrained by the selective medium CAS. The morphology of salmonella colonies could be distinguished easily from other bacteria. The time limit and sensitivity of detection for salmonella with CAS are significantly better than that with HE. It is suggested that CAS is the first choice on screening salmonella in food samples.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

闫琳,王晓英,郭云昌,裴晓燕,余东敏.两种选择性培养基HE、CAS检测沙门菌效果的比较[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2011,23(2):118-122.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭