我国的污染物基础标准与国际食品法典的污染物通用标准的比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

邵懿 女 实习研究员 研究方向为食品安全标准 E-mail: shaoyicdc@gmail.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TS207.2

基金项目:


Comparison and analysis on general standards of contaminants and toxins in food established by Codex Alimentarius Commission with the basic standards used in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    从标准涉及的污染物种类、食品类别和限量值3个方面来对比我国污染物基础标准与国际食品法典委员会(CAC)制定的污染物通用标准的异同,为我国污染物基础标准体系的完善提供参考。我国基础标准涉及污染物种类20种,CAC标准为15种,二者相同的污染物种类为8种;我国标准涉及的食品种类多于CAC标准;在可比指标范围内,我国有19个限量指标值与CAC标准相同,6个限量指标值宽于CAC标准,仅1个限量指标值严于CAC标准。我国污染物限量标准中有77%可比指标限量值已达到或超过CAC标准的要求,与CAC标准的一致性程度较高。

    Abstract:

    To compare general standards of contaminants and toxins in food established by Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) with the basic standards used in China in terms of contaminant species, food categories and maximum levels; and to provide evidence and reference for revising and improving our basic standards of contaminants and toxins in food. There are 20 contaminant species in our basic standards and 15 contaminant species in CAC standards; but 8 of them are the same. The food categories in our basic standards are more than that in CAC standards. Within comparable indexes, the maximum level of 19 indexes in China standards is equal to that in CAC standards, 6 of them are more generous than CAC standards and only one of them is stricter than CAC standards. Among the maximum levels, 77% in China basic standards are equal to or higher than the requirement of CAC standards, and the extent of coincidence with CAC general standards is very high.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邵懿,朱丽华,王君.我国的污染物基础标准与国际食品法典的污染物通用标准的比较[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2011,23(3):277-281.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-01
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭