从一起河鲀中毒调查探讨河鲀食用安全性的风险管理措施
作者:
作者单位:

(1.长沙市疾病预防控制中心,湖南 长沙 410004;2.中国疾病预防控制中心 中国现场 流行病学培训项目,北京 100050;3.广东省疾病预防控制中心,广东 广州 511430;4.广东省疾病预防控制中心 广东省现场流行病学培训项目,广东 广州 511430)

作者简介:

张恒 男 主管医师 研究方向为现场流行病学 E-mail:83302140@qq.com通信作者:┣┣(中)通信作者┫┫黄琼 女 副主任医师 研究方向为食源性疾病监测与暴发处置 E-mail:1485237556@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The food safety risk management measures on the puffer fish:discussion from an outbreak of puffer fish intoxication
Author:
Affiliation:

(Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Hunan Changsha 410004,China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    通过一起河鲀中毒事件的流行病学调查和人群关于河鲀安全性的知识、态度、行为(KAP)调查,探讨河鲀食用安全的风险管理措施。方法 通过病例搜索,调查病例家庭成员进食史及发病情况,采用回顾性队列研究分析发病的高危因素,制作调查问卷调查了解当地村民有关河鲀中毒的知识、态度和行为。结果 共搜索到14例病例,其中1例死亡。症状主要为头晕(100%)、四肢无力(79%)、四肢肌肉麻痹和行走困难(71%)、口舌肢端麻痹(71%)等。食用河鲀是发病的危险因素,加工过程保留鱼肝共同煮食可增加中毒的危险(RR=1.8,95%CI=1.1~3.1)。KAP调查发现70%(33/47)的村民近3年曾进食过河鲀,其中88%(29/33)来源于市场或流动摊贩;98%(46/47)的村民知道河鲀有毒,94%(44/47)的村民知道国家法律禁止食用河鲀鱼,但仍有94%(44/47)的人认为其味道鲜美值得品尝。结论 食用混杂于无毒河鲀中的有毒河鲀是导致本次食物中毒的主要原因。居民对河鲀安全性知晓率高但依从性差。

    Abstract:

    To discuss the safety risk management measures for puffer fish from the investigation on an outbreak of puffer fish intoxication and a knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) survey on the puffer fish safety.Methods The cases were searched and all of their family members were investigated on food exposure history. A cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors. A self-designed questionnaire was used for KAP investigation. Results 14 puffer fish poisoning cases (one case died) were identified. Clinical symptoms included dizziness (100%), weakness of limbs (79%), muscular paralysis of the limbs or walking difficulty (71%), orolingual numbness (71%), and so on. Eating poisonous puffer fish was the risk factor, and fish meat and fish liver cooked together was significantly associated with poisoning (RR=1.8,5%CI=1.1-3.1). The results of KAP showed that 70% (33/47) had puffer fish consumption in the last three years. 98% (46/47) knew the puffer fish was poisonous and 94% (44/47) knew the state law forbids eating puffer fish. Meanwhile 94% (44/47) of people considered the puffer a delicacy worth to eat. Conclusion This outbreak was caused by poisonous puffer fish consumption. Local residents had a high awareness of puffer safety, but a poor compliance to the prohibition of eating puffer fish.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张恒,李剑森,梁骏华,马兵成,刘素芬,马会来,黄琼.从一起河鲀中毒调查探讨河鲀食用安全性的风险管理措施[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2016,28(4):541-545.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-08-18
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭