检测诺如病毒的罗氏LightMix Kit方法与行业标准方法(SN/T 2626—2010)的比较研究
作者:
作者单位:

(1.中国食品药品检定研究院,北京 100050;2.罗氏诊断试剂上海有限公司, 上海 201101;3.吉林省长春市食品药品检验中心,吉林 长春 130012)

作者简介:

骆海朋 男 副主任检验技师 研究方向为食品微生物学E-mail:haipengluo123@ sina.com通信作者:┣┣(中)通信作者┫┫崔生辉 男 研究员 研究方向为食品微生物学及食品分子生物 E-mail:cuishenghui@aliyun. com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A comparative study of Roche LightMix Kit and the industry standard method(SN/T 2626-2010) for the detection of Norovirus
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.National Institute of Food and Drug Control,Beijing 100050,China;2.Roche Diagnostics(Shanghai)Limited, Shanghai 201101, China;3.Jilin Province Inspection Center for Food and Drug, Jilin Changchun 130012, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    结合不同标准和规范方法,对罗氏LightMix Kit诺如病毒检测试剂盒(以下简称罗氏方法)进行评价。方法 通过对217份门诊腹泻病人粪便标本和158份市场零售贝类样品中诺如病毒核酸平行检测,对比罗氏方法与我国SN/T 2626—2010《国境口岸诺如病毒检测方法》中逆转录-聚合酶链反应检测诺如病毒核酸方法(以下简称SN/T方法)对粪便标本与贝类样品中诺如病毒核酸检测结果的差异。结果 粪便标本的罗氏方法检测阳性率为27.2%(59/217),而SN/T方法检测阳性率为17.5%(38/217),两方法结果一致率为85.7%,检出率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。贝类样品的罗氏方法检测阳性率为32.9%(52/158),SN/T方法检测阳性率为30.4%(48/158),两方法对诺如病毒检测结果的一致率为87.3%,检出率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 市场零售贝类样品中诺如病毒污染率较高,罗氏方法以其快速、简便、灵敏、可靠的优点值得在食品微生物检测行业推广。

    Abstract:

    To compare LightMix Kit Norovirus detection kit from Roche diagnostics company(hereinafter referred to as “Roche method”) with different methods of standards and norms. Methods Two hundred and twenty-seven stool samples of diarrhea patients and 158 shellfish samples from retail markets were detected by Roche method and SN/T 2626-2010 detection of Norovirus at frontier port reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to detect Norovirus method(hereinafter referred to as SN/T method). By parallel detection, the differences between the two methods were compared. Results For stool samples, about 27.2%(59/217)stool samples were positive by Roche method, while 17.5% (38/217) samples were positive by SN/T method. The consistence between the two methods was 85.7% and the detection rate of Roche methods was significantly higher than that of SN/T method(P<0.05). For shellfish samples, about 32.9%(52/158)shellfish samples were positives by Roche method and 30.4%(48/158)samples were positive by SN/T method. The consistence between the two methods was 87.3% and the detection rate had no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion The Norovirus contamination of shellfish samples from retail market was high. Roche method was rapid, simple, sensitive and reliable to detect Norovirus, and was worthy to promote in food microbiology testing industry.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

骆海朋,康敏华,于海瑶,高飞,任秀,余文,崔生辉.检测诺如病毒的罗氏LightMix Kit方法与行业标准方法(SN/T 2626—2010)的比较研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2017,29(1):47-51.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-27
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-03-15
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭