不同方法对大米中无机砷含量测定结果的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

岳兵 男 实习研究员 研究方向为食品安全风险评估Email:yuebing@cfsa.net.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAK01B01)


Influence of determination methods on the content of inorganic arsenic in rice
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    建立不同方法测定大米和以大米为原料的食品中无机砷的含量,并对结果进行比较。方法用0.15mol/L硝酸或0.3mol/L三氟乙酸作为提取液,95℃下热辅助提取2h、75℃下超声提取2h或90℃下微波辅助提取1h,提取物经阴离子交换柱X-100(250mm×4.1mm,10μm)分离,电感耦合等离子体-质谱(ICP-MS)和氢化物发生-原子荧光光谱(HG-AFS)分别测定。结果两种方法测定无机砷含量,加标回收率分别在94.8%~111.7%、91.9%~96.0%之间,相对标准偏差均小于5.8%,应用这两种方法对质控样品米粉SRM 1568a和大米样品进行测定,结果协同性良好。结论 两种方法均可简单、准确、快速的测定大米中的无机砷,结果比较差异无统计学意义。

    Abstract:

    To establish methods for the detection of inorganic arsenic in rice and rice-based foodstuff and compare the results deviation of various extracting and/or instrumental process. MethodsThe extraction conditions for inorganic arsenic extraction in rice were 0.15mol /L nitric acid or 0.3mol/L TFA; heat-assistant extraction 2h,95℃; ultrasonic 2h,75℃; microwave-assist 1h ,90℃. Then the extracts were separated by an anion exchange column Hamilton PRP X-100(250mm×4.1mm, 10μm) and detected by ICP-MS and HG-AFS respectively. Results The determination of inorganic arsenic of these two methods was good. The recoveries of spiked samples were 94.8%~111.7% and 91.9%~96.0%, and the relative standard deviations (RSD,n=6) were below 5.8%. The results were satisfying for control sample (SRM1568a) and rice samples. Conclusion The methods were simple, accurate and fast for the determination of inorganic arsenic in rice and rice-based foodstuff. There was no significant statistic difference among the results.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

岳兵,刘丽萍,谢科,潘浩,尚晓虹,李筱薇,赵云峰,吴永宁.不同方法对大米中无机砷含量测定结果的影响[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2013,25(3):238-240.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2013-06-19
  • 出版日期:
《中国食品卫生杂志》邮寄地址与联系方式变更通知
关闭